-
Marrying first cousins in Islam
The idea that marrying first cousins is harmful is very doubtful, but even if there is some harm in it, opposing it totally requires a very narrow, Western, materialistic, and individualistic perspective given the benefits.
The belief that marrying cousins is harmful arose in a context where there was intense inbreeding for multiple consecutive generations, often by cousins who were closely related on both the paternal and maternal sides.
The main motivation for this was the preservation of wealth and power within a single dynasty.
As is often the case in the West, they swung from one extreme to the other, until it reached the point where they even banned marriage to sixth cousins, which ultimately eroded family ties and empowered the Church and the State. So there was a clear material motivation.
Modern studies that claim congenital birth defects are higher among couples who are first cousins are extremely flawed. For example, one of the most cited studies was conducted in the UK and looked primarily at Pakistani immigrant families.
The study found that the risk of birth defects was around 6% for children born from cousin couples and around 3%, but there are a couple of factors that were not considered.
One is that most Pakistani households in the UK are what are termed lower income households and that lower income households in general have higher rates of birth defects. Subsequent studies tried to adjust for this, and found that the rates of birth defects were lower, but still higher than in couples that were more distantly related.
Another issue which was not considered in these studies, however, is that many of these families marry cousins for many generations for un-Islamic reasons, and reject outright the possibility of marrying their children to righteous, religious spouses outside of the family completely.
Furthermore, since jihad has been abandoned for generations there is no more influx of slaves to bring diversity into the gene pool. More expensive, Westernized lifestyles also limit family size, meaning that families who consistently and exclusively marry cousins draw from an ever shrinking genetic pool.
Many or perhaps most of the families included in these studies fit this description, and none of these studies consider how many generations these families have been marrying cousins and what their attitudes toward marrying outside of the family are. Unfortunately many families who marry cousins have extremely hostile attitudes toward other tribes, nationalities, and races, which over generations could augment the risk factors associated with cousin marriage.
Still, even with all the flaws in these studies, the increased risk of birth defects is similar to the risk associated with women delaying pregnancy until later in life, and yet none of these people ever criticize women delaying pregnancy in order to pursue careers.
When it comes to technologies which are strongly linked to birth defects such as synthetic fertilizers, pesticides, and pharmaceutical medications which inevitably leech into the water supply, somehow they view this increased risk as acceptable due to the perceived benefits.
These individualists also don’t consider the benefits of cousin marriage when weighing harms and benefits, and this is because most of these benefits are based in factors that they don’t consider in their narrow, almost autistic style of analysis.
For example, cousin marriages are less likely to end in divorce, probably because people from the same family and culture have similar values and often higher compatibility, which can mean less stress and conflict in many cases.
It also reinforces a strong and clear sense of cultural identity, which is associated with many positive mental and physical health outcomes.
Cousin marriages also have higher rates of fertility than non-cousin marriages, so even if a a child is born with birth defects there is likely to be more children to help care for their sibling.
Finally, and most importantly, Muslims understand that there is a purpose and a plan behind illness and disability. It reminds us of our weakness, causes us to turn to Allah for help, and helping to care for the sick or disabled with patience is a source of great reward with Allah. Disabled people may also have spiritual or emotional value which makes up for any physical or mental weakness they have.
We do not, thus, regard the sick or disabled as unwanted, defective, or inferior.
Viewing the disabled as inferior or unwanted causes massive psychological harm to them, which in turn harms the surrounding society, and this happens frequently with the kuffar.
The benefits of cousin marriage are more difficult to quantify, so the kuffar shift the focus toward what they are able to measure, part of their quest for omniscience and to actualize a theology in which human beings are elevated to the level of Allah.
On the other hand, Muslims who abandon Islamic marriage guidelines, focus excessively on cousin marriage, adopt prejudicial attitudes toward other tribes or ethnicities, and close themselves off to the rest of the ummah may be helping feed the narratives of the enemies of Islam.
May Allah guide us and make us steadfast upon Islam, which is a balanced way of life, and protect us from the excesses, imbalance and extremes of shortsighted and flawed manmade ideologies that foolishly exalt human perception and logic above revelation.
-
Demographic decline: the self-destruction of the West
The kuffar are destroying themselves with the same technology that appears to be so powerful.
Consider the demographic problems highly industrialized societies like W. Europe, North America, China, and Japan are facing.
Low birth rates lead to an increasingly elderly population. With fewer younger people to care for all the elderly, there is a heavier burden on both the government and the young. The government has fewer workers to pay taxes with more expenses to care for elderly.
This means increasing taxes, which causes discontent among the population and weakens the government’s grip on power.
This also erodes the West’s claim to moral superiority, because they maintain order by paying out benefits rather than using raw violence.
Furthermore, these countries have to depend more and more on immigration to cover labor shortages. This decreases overall social cohesion and also increases tension.
This can be observed in the far right backlash against immigrants in Western Europe and North America, which is a major flashpoint in these countries’ descent toward civil war.
Less labor supply means labor costs go up, which drives inflation by making everything more expensive. Higher prices, of course, also fuel social tension inside of these countries. Since neo-colonial subjects also depend on supplies from neo-colonial master countries, it also causes unrest in the 3rd world slave countries, putting more pressure on the neo-colonial relationships.
And what is the source of this demographic imbalance?
It’s mainly that as technology becomes more advanced, the knowledge required to produce it becomes more specialized, requiring ever longer and more specialized education.
People are busy with their education, so don’t have children until much later. They also try to avoid having too many children due to the high cost of education and the fact that children don’t help economically due to mechanization.
Children not working further erodes the quality of society by leading to generations of entitled, spoiled brats with no discipline, gratitude, or sense of responsibility, meaning the quality as well as the quantity of the population declines.
This is not to mention the fact that delaying or abandoning marriage leads to the rise of a “hook up” culture which results in women getting emotionally ravaged and the rampant spread of mental illness, further eroding the overall health of the society.
Add to that the heavy load of industrial pollution, including toxic chemical and radiation causing hormonal imbalances and cancer.
You don’t need to see research about this – just go to rural Afghanistan or Mali and look at the people, and compare them to people in the West.
Making matters worse, continually advancing technology requires ever more expensive, advanced education, which means the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, because fewer people can afford to reach the top echelons of industry.
This adds to social tension even more.
So the kuffar achieve some impressive little feats in the very short term with their gadgets. However, they inflict even more harm on themselves in the process than whatever harm they do to the Muslims with their planes, guided missiles and artillery.
ان يمسسكم قرح فقد مس القوم قرح مثله“If a wound should touch you, there has already touched the [opposing] people a wound similar to it.” [3:140]
The general principle here is that if the kuffar inflict harm upon the believers, they too are inflicted with harm.
و تلك الايام نداولها بين الناس وليعلم الله لذين ءامنوا و يتخذ منكم شهداء
“And these days of various [of varying conditions] We alternate among the people so that Allah may make evident those who believe and [may] take to Himself from among you martyrs…” [3:140, continued]
It’s a constant principle from Dawud and Jalut to the Battle of Badr that faith overcomes the appearance of worldly strength and power.
The purpose of fighting, for a believer, is to attain the mercy and acceptance of Allah by striving to make the word of Allah supreme.
Achieving this purpose does not depend on technology. Even honorable defeats are part of an ongoing struggle, as the Muslims today take inspiration from the struggle of mujahideen like Umar al Mukhtar or Imam Shamil, may Allah accept them.
So we should really not be amazed by dishonorable and cowardly engineers and scientists who devise methods to kill thousands of Muslims while simultaneously destroying both the dunya and akhira of their own people. If we can use these tehnologies without doing haram, fine.
If not, then we need not view the technologies as a prerequisite for armed struggle. The nature of asymmetric warfare also means that expensive technology can rapidly become a liability due to the cost of maintaining and deploying it.
This was also the case in the Battle of the Trench, where initially the confederates appeared fearsome and far more powerful than the Muslims due to having a large amount of cavalry, but with time they were unable to feed their horses, leading the army to disperse.
So don’t be like the treacherous Banu Qurayza, who went over to the side of the kuffar because of being amazed by their appearance of strength and power.
The promise of Allah is true, jannah is true, and jahannam is true, so fear Allah and go forth when you are called to do so.
-
Trading what is better for what is worse
Believing that Western technological development is a net gain for humanity is incompatible with sound Islamic creed. Have we been so indoctrinated with materialism that we can’t see that this “advancement” is trading what is better for what is worse?
The purpose of life is to worship Allah, subhanahu wa t’ala. A calamity which brings us closer to Allah is better than a blessing which causes us to forget Him.
Even in a purely materialistic sense, Western technology is a massive fail. Why?
- Humanity and the earth are interconnected and interdependent.
- Development of Western technology did not lead to an overall improvement in the human condition, rather it elevated the condition of some humans at the expense of other humans and natural systems.
- Social actions yield social reactions. Interactions with nature yield natural reactions.
- Achieving Western technological progress required a level of cruelty so high that Westerners had to suppress their natural mercy (fitra).
- The loss of this fitra contributed to a disintegration of their social interactions with each other, leading to a disintegration of social relations and widespread sense of isolation and depression.
- The excesses generated by the “progress” led to a sense of purposelessness and a cycle of intensifying, mindless consumption, compounding the cycle.
- The material consequences of the “progress” are causing increasingly severe destructive climatic events.
- Most of the resource surplus attained through extreme cruelty and destruction goes toward attempting to fix the problems that cruelty and destruction caused, whether through entertainment, seeking pleasure through status symbols, or attempting to remediate various crises.
- The measures used to address the numerous crises do not solve the crises, but only defer their proliferation into more crises of increasing intensity.
- Eventually this game of “kick the can down the road” will fall apart, and a huge entropic debt will have to be paid.
- The inevitability of the failure of this system can be easily ascertained with logical certainty.
- Western civilization is a humiliating failure of epic proportions, and only the willfully blind (kuffar) can fail to see this.
- To bring about this massive failure, the kuffar have sacrificed the true purpose of their life, which is to worship our Creator and Sustainer sincerely and exclusively.
- Kufr is ingratitude and arrogance.
- To reject the purpose for which we were created is ingratitude. To believe that we can achieve some other aim (such as immortality) through our own power and ingenuity is arrogance.
- Muslims are winning the “war on terror” by any metric you care to use.
- This struggle does not need us. We need it.
- Who moves away from the struggle and toward the luxury and illusion of safety of the civilization of failure does so to the detriment of their own soul.
